First data center online
Tract Hanover is projected to generate ~$1.5M in first-year net surplus. Resident share pending resolution adoption.
Forget the politics. Here's the math. The Hanover Framework channels 50% of audited net data center surplus to residents as rate cuts or rebates. The table below shows what that looks like at three milestones.
Annual property tax savings under the Hanover Framework.
Annual savings = assessed value × rate cut (in cents) ÷ 10,000. For example, 2.2¢ on a $400,000 home = $400,000 × 0.022 = $88/year. Figures assume the full framework is adopted and that the 50% resident share is delivered as a uniform residential rate cut.
Actual savings will depend on assessed value, any homestead exemption applied, and the exact final framework terms adopted by the Board. Question the math →
Source: Hanover Framework Coalition, projected from the Tract Hanover revenue model.
The framework doesn't promise relief. It guarantees it, phased with the data center buildout.
Tract Hanover is projected to generate ~$1.5M in first-year net surplus. Resident share pending resolution adoption.
A 2.2-cent rate cut is funded entirely by data center revenue, with no impact on school funding, public safety, or other services.
At full buildout, the framework supports an 8-cent residential rate cut, funded exclusively by data center tax revenue.
After offsetting direct service costs from data center growth, every dollar of net surplus splits 50/50 between residents and the County. The County share is then split three ways. Here's the full picture.
Direct property tax relief, rate cuts or rebates. Audited annually and published on the public dashboard.
Schools, roads, public safety facilities, broadband. The infrastructure that data center growth demands.
A rainy-day fund. If a data center depreciates equipment or wins an unexpected abatement, residents don't lose services.
Planning, environmental monitoring, public safety near data center sites.
The 50/25/15/10 is a proposed default. The Hanover Framework requires that the 50% county share be split among capital, stabilization, and operations, but the exact percentages are set when the Board adopts the resolution. The key constraint: none of the 50% can be redirected to the general fund. Every dollar is auditable and traceable on the public dashboard.
If Henrico had used the Hanover Framework split, their first-year $13.6M would have looked like this:
Henrico actually delivered $18.3M in total new tax relief, well above the 50% residents share, because the rate cut leveraged existing revenue. The framework guarantees the 50% floor; the rate design amplifies it.